← back  ·  FLD-01

Infographic shaped as a tree mapping the 1776 diaspora: 212.8 million living descendants from a 2.65 million original 1776 ancestor pool (75.5% European, 18.9% Black, 5.7% Indigenous). Top international hubs: Canada 6.7M, Mexico 1.2M, UK 943k. US states with highest ancestry density: West Virginia 83.0%, Mississippi 82.8%, Alabama 80.2%. Notes the binary criterion (one ancestor qualifies) and the old-stock economic paradox (higher colonial-ancestry density correlates with lower median household income). ↗ open full size

companion overview

The 212 Million Global Descendants of 1776

NotebookLM overview, generated from this study

Founding-lineage-diaspora

Estimate the global living population of individuals with at least one ancestor who was alive and residing in the territory of the Thirteen Colonies in 1776. The criterion is binary: a single colonial ancestor anywhere in the family tree is enough.

U.S. states · share with ≥1 colonial ancestor
other countries · descendants per 1,000 residents
global, today
in the United States
outside the United States

loading dataset…

1776 Baseline · who actually lived here

The estimator treats the 13 colonies' 1776 territory as the ancestor pool. Roughly 2.65 million people resided in that territory once Indigenous nations living within colonial claims are counted alongside the U.S. Census Bureau's colonial enumeration. The left panel shows the racial distribution; the right panel names individuals from races other than white-European or Black-African — almost entirely Indigenous, with a brief note on the near-absence of documented Asian residents.

Racial distribution, ~2.65M residents

Indigenous count is given as 150k (90% range 100k–200k). The U.S. Census Bureau's 2.5M figure enumerates only the colonial population; we add Indigenous nations residing inside the colonies' claimed boundaries to get the territorial denominator.

Notable residents in 1776 — faces by category

Indigenous nations of the 1776 sphere

The colonial population in 1776 lived alongside ~15 Indigenous nations whose territory lay within or directly adjacent to the Thirteen Colonies. Roughly 150,000 people total — Cherokee largest, then the Iroquois Confederacy and Muscogee Creek. Modern enrolled counts (federally + state-recognized successor nations) are shown alongside; descendant figures use a loose definition (anyone with documented descent, enrolled or not) and run several times higher. Hover for the 1776 → today trajectory.

Challenge the assumptions

Three knobs move the answer the most. Drag to see how the headline number and country breakdown shift. The map of population locations is the same dataset; only the lineage math changes.

0.93

Pew/ancestry literature anchors this near 0.93. Lower it and the share of total ancestry that must come from the white population rises (and the reconciler may flag infeasible).

1.00

Multiplies each decade's ancestry_share prior. 1.0 keeps the published curve; below 1 says recent emigrants carry less colonial lineage than the literature suggests; above 1 says more.

1.55

Surviving descendants per parent, per 25-year generation. 1.0 is exact replacement; 1.55 is the mid-range fertility-and-survival assumption used here.

0.60

The Ancestry.com 2010 figure. Drives the back-solve for the white-American rate.

U.S. breakdown by race

Back-solved from the national identity. The reconciler is feasible iff the implied white-American rate lands inside [0, 1].

Diaspora map

Each dot sits at a receiving country's centroid; radius scales with descendant count under the current assumptions. Hover for the per-country breakdown by departure decade. Loyalist (1783) cohorts are shown in warm yellow; voluntary emigrant flows in cool blue.

By U.S. state

Per-state share of residents with at least one ancestor present in the Thirteen Colonies in 1776. Each row applies the same race-share reconciler to that state's ACS demography, scaled by a state-specific colonial_stock_factor hand-curated from the 2000 Census detailed- ancestry tables and known settlement-stream geography. Sliders above re-run the math live.

R swing D
2024

Compare two states

Side-by-side snapshot for any two jurisdictions. Ancestry rates re-run as the sliders move; demographic and economic indicators are 2023-2024 ACS / BEA / CDC and stay fixed.

vs.

Does 1776 ancestry correlate with lower state income?

PDC hypothesis: high state-level concentrations of 1776 ancestry signal a lack of recent in-migration (a proxy for lack of recent economic development), so old-stock states should be poorer. Plot below: each dot is a state, x-axis is its f_state, y-axis is its 2023 median household income. Color follows the political-lean swatch. The straight line is a least-squares fit on the visible data. The chart always uses the current-year (2024) ancestry rate, so it stays comparable with the 2023 income axis even when the historical timeline above is moved.

Country detail

Sorted by descendant count, with each country's lineage decomposed by departure decade. The "Loyalist" band is the 1783 cohort with ancestry_share locked at 1.0; the engine treats those descendants as a separate seeded propagator.

Sensitivity

Elasticity of the global total to a 5% change in each knob, evaluated at the baseline assumption point. Positive values mean increasing the knob increases the answer.