Slide deck cover 'The Spatial Economics of Historic Preservation' — economic and GIS analysis of 1,295 Historic-Cultural Monuments in Los Angeles, mapping opportunity costs of designation against land value, household income, and housing density; dot map showing HCM clustering in high-value central and westside tracts ↗ open full size

companion overview

How LA Historic Preservation Blocks Housing

NotebookLM overview, generated from this study

gis study — generated 2026-05-17

economic gis study

does los angeles preserve its historic buildings where land is most valuable — and does that restriction land hardest on low-income neighborhoods? this study places all 1295 active hcms on a tract grid of la county (≈2,500 tracts) and compares the spatial signature of preservation against four economic layers: land value, household income, jobs-per-resident, and reported crime.

54.1% of hcms sit in the top 30% of tracts by median home value. only 9.4% sit in the bottom 30%. preservation concentrates in expensive land.

hcm hcm flagged candidate / blocking redevelopment by the audit's rubric la city boundary (only buildings inside are eligible for hcm)

Economic land value — ACS B25077 median owner-occupied home value (tract, 2023)
Median household income — ACS B19013 (tract, 2023)
Jobs per resident — LODES 2021 workplace jobs ÷ ACS population — jobs-rich vs housing-rich tracts
Crime per 1,000 residents — LAPD reported crime 2024 ÷ ACS population

hcm concentration by tract decile

for each metric, the table shows how many of the 1295 tract-matched hcms fall into each decile of la county tracts. a uniform distribution would put ~10% in each decile. heavy skew to high deciles (d8–d10) means hcms cluster in the high-value / high-income / jobs-rich / high-crime end of the city. heavy skew to low deciles means the opposite.

metric bottom 30% (d1–d3) middle 40% (d4–d7) top 30% (d8–d10) unranked
Economic land value 122 (9.4%) 271 (20.9%) 701 (54.1%) 201
Median household income 539 (41.6%) 357 (27.6%) 374 (28.9%) 25
Jobs per resident 245 (18.9%) 518 (40.0%) 530 (40.9%) 2
Crime per 1,000 residents 229 (17.7%) 453 (35.0%) 611 (47.2%) 2

if hcm placement were random across la county tracts, each row would read 30 / 40 / 30. deviations identify the spatial signature of the designation regime — does it cover where the city is valuable, where it is poor, where it has jobs, or where it has crime?

findings

1295 of 1295 hcms joined cleanly to a tract. placement is non-random against every one of the four metrics:

the four signals together: preservation in la is concentrated on dense, expensive, jobs-rich, lower-income, higher-crime land. that profile fits the "saving old neighborhoods from speculation" defense and the "blocking higher-value use in the wrong places" critique equally well. discriminating between them requires the parcel-level six-axis rubric on the hcm-1200 page.

hollywood — 536 hcms mapped by condition & economic potential

all 536 hcms within the hollywood community plan area plotted against land value. dot color = structural/occupancy condition. dot size = estimated redevelopment potential. gold diamonds = major tourist anchors (walk of fame, tcl chinese theatre, dolby theatre, hollywood bowl). dashed red ring = building actively detracting from tourist experience (vacant or failing in high-exposure location).

Hollywood HCMs — all 536 monuments colored by structural condition, sized by redevelopment potential
41 blocking or underutilizing premium land
0 documented structural failure
6 trapped residential below economic potential
4 detracting from tourism (vacant/failing in tourist zone)
5 actively contributing to tourist experience

top 20 by estimated redevelopment potential

current est = 65% of tract median home value (parcel-to-tract discount). potential est = current × necessity-based density uplift × tourism premium. uplift multiples: confirmed blocker 8.5×, likely blocker 7×, possible blocker 5.5×, trapped residential 5×, architecturally significant 1.8×.

building condition current est potential est uplift tourism
Southern California Telephone Company Exchange
650-668 South La Brea Avenue
Likely blocker $1.30M $9.1M Peripheral
C.E. Toberman Estate
1847 Camino Palmero
Trapped residential — below economic potential $1.30M $7.5M 5.8× Likely detracts
Pacifics Cinerama Dome Theatre and Marquee
6360 Sunset Boulevard
Possible blocker — underutilized $1.01M $7.5M 7.4× Mixed
Fred C. Thomson Building
6536 Sunset Boulevard & 1450 Seward Street
Possible blocker — underutilized $1.01M $7.5M 7.4× Mixed
Farmers Market
West 3rd Street / Fairfax Avenue and Gilmore Lane
Possible blocker — underutilized $1.30M $7.2M 5.5× Peripheral
Norm's La Cienega Coffee Shop
470 North La Cienega Boulevard
Possible blocker — underutilized $1.30M $7.2M 5.5× Peripheral
Roman Gardens
2000 North Highland Avenue
Trapped residential — below economic potential $1.06M $7.1M 6.8× Likely detracts
Courtney Desmond Estate
1801-1811 Courtney Avenue
Trapped residential — below economic potential $1.30M $6.5M Peripheral
Monterey Apartments
4600-4604 Los Fellz Boulevard
Trapped residential — below economic potential $1.10M $5.5M Peripheral
Community Laundry Company Building
900-930 North Highland Avenue
Likely blocker $0.77M $5.4M Peripheral
Howard Hughes Headquarters
7000-7020 Romaine Street; 930-956 North Sycamore Avenue; 931-953 North Orange Drive
Likely blocker $0.77M $5.4M Peripheral
Echo Park
751 North Echo Park Avenue
Likely blocker $0.77M $5.4M Peripheral
McKee General Contractor Office
4101 East Goodwin Ave & 4701 San Fernando Road
Likely blocker $0.76M $5.3M Peripheral
YWCA Hollywood Studio Club
1215-1233 Lodi Place
Likely blocker $0.72M $5.0M Neutral
Charlie Chaplin Studios
1416 North La Brea Avenue and 7053-7067 De Longpre Avenue
Possible blocker — underutilized $0.65M $4.8M 7.4× Mixed
El Capitan Theater Building
6834-6838 Hollywood Boulevard
Possible blocker — underutilized $0.65M $4.8M 7.4× Mixed
Earl Carroll Theater
6220-6230 Sunset Boulevard
Possible blocker — underutilized $0.72M $4.5M 6.3× Mixed
Chateau Elysee
5925-5939 Yucca Street, 5930-5936 Franklin Avenue, and 1806-1830 Tamarind Avenue
Likely blocker $0.63M $4.4M Neutral
The Outpost 11
1851 Outpost Drive
Insufficient data — reassess $1.30M $4.4M 3.4× Neutral
N.F. Stokes Residence
1905 Grace Avenue
Insufficient data — reassess $1.30M $4.4M 3.4× Neutral

source: tract land value (ACS 5yr 2023 via ESRI Living Atlas); redevelopment potential is an indicative model, not a formal appraisal. tourism scores use walk-of-fame anchor set (10M annual visitors) with inverse-distance weighting. full dataset (json)

hollywood — focused cluster maps by tract & street

zoomed views of the 4 highest-density hcm concentrations within the hollywood community plan area. each map shows individual census tract boundaries (colored by median land value), named street rights-of-way from openstreetmap, and all hcms within the view colored by structural condition and sized by estimated redevelopment potential.

#1 Echo Park 55 hcms
Echo Park — focused HCM cluster map showing tracts and street ROW
3 blockers / trapped top: Echo Park ($5.4M potential)
  • unknown 36
  • active 12
  • significant active 2
  • likely blocker 1
  • possible blocker 1
#2 La Brea / Mid-Wilshire 26 hcms
La Brea / Mid-Wilshire — focused HCM cluster map showing tracts and street ROW
2 blockers / trapped top: Southern California Telephone Company Exchange ($9.1M potential)
  • unknown 18
  • occupied light 6
  • likely blocker 1
  • possible blocker 1
#3 Mid-Hollywood 69 hcms
Mid-Hollywood — focused HCM cluster map showing tracts and street ROW
14 blockers / trapped top: Pacifics Cinerama Dome Theatre and Marquee ($7.5M potential)
  • unknown 27
  • occupied light 15
  • possible blocker 8
  • redundant 5
  • likely blocker 4
#4 Larchmont / Melrose 47 hcms
Larchmont / Melrose — focused HCM cluster map showing tracts and street ROW
1 blockers / trapped top: Beneficial Plaza and Liberty Park ($3.9M potential)
  • unknown 27
  • occupied light 12
  • active 4
  • exempt 2
  • likely blocker 1

maps generated from openstreetmap road data (© osm contributors, odbl). tract data: acs 5yr 2023. focus area: ±0.01° lat × ±0.012° lon (~1.4 mi) around the densest hcm grid cell.

opportunity zones — high-frequency blocking clusters

grid-cell hotspot analysis (≈0.4 mi cells) merged into 8 contiguous zones where hcm legislation is most concentrated against high-value land. zones are ranked by cumulative opportunity score (sum of land value decile × housing density gap across all buildings in zone). each numbered rectangle on the map is a distinct opportunity zone.

HCM opportunity zones map — numbered clusters of blocking HCMs on land value background
  1. #1 Hollywood 1142 pts
    20 buildings · avg land $1.19M (d8.5/10) · 11 possible blocker · 7 likely blocker · 2 trapped use
    lead blocker: Roman Gardenstrapped use
    • 102 Roman Gardens — 2000 North Highland Avenue
    • 101 Pacifics Cinerama Dome Theatre and Marquee — 6360 Sunset Boulevard
    • 101 Fred C. Thomson Building — 6536 Sunset Boulevard & 1450 Seward Street
    • 94 Villa Carlotta — 5959 Franklin Avenue
    • 92 Community Laundry Company Building — 900-930 North Highland Avenue
    • +15 more
  2. #2 Westlake 883 pts
    25 buildings · avg land $0.81M (d5.5/10) · 17 likely blocker · 6 possible blocker · 2 confirmed blocker
    lead blocker: Bullock's Wilshire Buildingpossible blocker
    • 94 Bullock's Wilshire Building — 2973-2989 West 7th Street, 658-690 Westmoreland Avenue, 3050-3070 Wilshire Boulevard, and 655-685 Wilshire Place
    • 83 Naval and Marine Corps Reserve Center — 1700 East Stadium Way
    • 81 Harris Newmark Building — 127 East 9th Street
    • 81 State Theater Building — 701-723 South Broadway and 300-314 West 7th Street
    • 72 Cathedral High School — 1253 Bishops Road
    • +20 more
  3. #3 Eagle Rock / Highland Park 598 pts
    8 buildings · avg land $0.89M (d6.8/10) · 8 trapped use
    lead blocker: Valley Knudsen Garden and Residence (Heritage Square)trapped use
    • 78 Valley Knudsen Garden and Residence (Heritage Square) — 3800 Homer Street
    • 78 Mount Pleasant House (Heritage Square) — 3800 Homer Street
    • 78 Beaudry Avenue House — 3800 Homer Street
    • 78 Octagon House (Heritage Square) — 3800 Homer Street
    • 78 Ivar I. Phillips Dwelling — 4200 North Figueroa Street
    • +3 more
  4. #4 West Hollywood 210 pts
    2 buildings · avg land $2.00M (d10/10) · 2 trapped use
    lead blocker: C.E. Toberman Estatetrapped use
    • 105 C.E. Toberman Estate — 1847 Camino Palmero
    • 105 Courtney Desmond Estate — 1801-1811 Courtney Avenue
  5. #5 Los Feliz 182 pts
    2 buildings · avg land $1.17M (d9/10) · 1 possible blocker · 1 likely blocker
    lead blocker: Albert Van Luit Complexpossible blocker
    • 91 Albert Van Luit Complex — 4000-4010 East Chevy Chase Drive
    • 91 McKee General Contractor Office — 4101 East Goodwin Ave & 4701 San Fernando Road
  6. #6 Silver Lake / Echo Park 160 pts
    2 buildings · avg land $1.00M (d7.5/10) · 1 likely blocker · 1 possible blocker
    lead blocker: Echo Parklikely blocker
    • 96 Echo Park — 751 North Echo Park Avenue
    • 64 TAIX French Restaurant — 1911 West Sunset Boulevard & 1980 Reservoir Street
  7. #7 Westwood / Century City 143 pts
    3 buildings · avg land $0.91M (d7/10) · 3 possible blocker
    lead blocker: Fox Bruin Theaterpossible blocker
    • 71 Fox Bruin Theater — 926-950 Broxton Avenue and 10935-10943 Weyburn Avenue
    • 71 Holmby Building — 901-951 South Westwood Boulevard
    • 1 Westwood Village Memorial Park — 1218 Glendon Avenue
  8. #8 North Hollywood 99 pts
    3 buildings · avg land $1.17M (d9/10) · 1 possible blocker · 1 likely blocker · 1 trapped use
    lead blocker: Amelia Earhart Branch (North Hollywood Branch Library)possible blocker
    • 95 Amelia Earhart Branch (North Hollywood Branch Library) — 5211 North Tujunga Avenue
    • 2 El Portal Theater — 5265-5271 Lankershim Boulevard and 11200-11220 Weddington Street
    • 2 Weddington House — 11025 West Weddington Street

redevelopment opportunity — buildings blocking higher use

97 hcms are classified as actively blocking redevelopment or trapping lower uses than their site conditions support. the map below plots them by opportunity score (land value decile × housing-rich location gap). larger dots = higher opportunity cost. colors separate confirmed blockers from likely, possible, and use-trapping patterns.

HCM redevelopment opportunity map — dot size proportional to opportunity score

by neighborhood download full ranked list (csv)

neighborhood buildings avg opportunity score avg land value top blocker type
Brentwood / Bel Air 1 107 $2.00M Cliff May Experimental House trapped use
West Hollywood 4 103 $2.00M C.E. Toberman Estate trapped use
Mid-Wilshire 1 101 $2.00M Southern California Telephone Company Exchange likely blocker
San Fernando Valley (West) 1 91 $1.12M Pepper Trees (Ventura Boulevard to Saltillo Street) possible blocker
Silver Lake / Echo Park 3 81 $0.98M Echo Park likely blocker
Eagle Rock / Highland Park 9 77 $0.93M Argus Court trapped use
Los Feliz 4 72 $1.34M Monterey Apartments trapped use
San Fernando Valley (East) 6 60 $1.20M The Magnolia trapped use
Hollywood 20 57 $1.17M Roman Gardens trapped use
Koreatown 5 52 $1.00M Bullock's Wilshire Building possible blocker
Westwood / Century City 3 48 $0.91M Fox Bruin Theater possible blocker
Boyle Heights 1 45 $0.67M Brooklyn Avenue Neighborhood Corridor likely blocker
El Sereno / Lincoln Heights 3 42 $0.68M Villa Rafael trapped use
Culver City / Venice 3 38 $2.00M Venice Lifeguard Station possible blocker
Downtown 17 36 $0.74M Harris Newmark Building possible blocker
West Adams / Crenshaw 4 36 $0.83M Residence likely blocker
South LA 5 25 $0.55M Cadet Records likely blocker
Watts / Southeast LA 1 15 $0.54M Watts City Hall and Engine Company No. 65 possible blocker
Westlake / MacArthur Park 6 10 $0.62M Pacific Dining Car likely blocker

opportunity score = land value decile (0–10) × 10 + (11 − jobs-per-resident decile). higher scores indicate more expensive land being under-occupied relative to surrounding density. neighborhood assignment uses nearest centroid from 19 major la districts.

method & sources

what is being measured

tract-level spatial-correlation: every la county tract gets a value on each metric, then each hcm is point-in-polygon-joined to its tract. the decile distribution of those tracts is the spatial signature of the designation regime against that metric. this is not a parcel-level economic appraisal — for that, see the six-axis rubric on the hcm-1200 page.

economic land value proxy

median owner-occupied home value (ACS B25077_001E) — structure-plus-land, but at the tract scale it correlates closely with both assessed land value and recent transaction prices. tracts dominated by rentals (e.g. downtown) often have null B25077 and show as "unranked".

household income

median household income (ACS B19049_001E, all householders).

jobs per resident

jobs (LEHD LODES 2021 WAC, all workers) ÷ population (ACS B01001_001E). LODES counts where workers work, not where they live — so high deciles are jobs centers (dtla, century city, hollywood), low deciles are residential exporters.

crime per 1,000 residents

lapd crime data via the socrata api (2nrs-mtv8.json), 2024 calendar year, geolocated incidents only — lapd suppresses lat/lon for incidents involving juveniles or specific privacy categories, so this undercounts in tracts where suppression rates are higher.

la city boundary

only buildings inside the heavy black line are eligible for hcm designation. surrounding county tracts (beverly hills, culver city, west hollywood, pasadena, long beach, the unincorporated strips) are rendered for context but cannot host an hcm. la city is discontiguous — the line traces the main contiguous area plus the san pedro / wilmington panhandle and a small palisades exclave.

decile bucketing

each metric is percentile-ranked across all la county tracts with a non-null value. ranks → deciles 1-10. hcms join their tract via point-in-polygon on parcel centroid coordinates. unranked = the hcm's tract has a null metric (typically no owner-occupied housing for B25077, or zero population for the ratios).

limitations

tract-level medians hide parcel variation — a single tract may contain a $5m hillside parcel and a $400k flatlands parcel. for the hcm-1200 question this is a feature, not a bug; the audit is asking whether the regime concentrates in spatially-coherent areas, not whether any one parcel is mispriced. crime is one calendar year. land value is the latest 5-year acs (≈2018–2022), so it lags the current market by ~2 years.

sources