Slide deck cover 'The Los Angeles Encampment Churn Map — Policy Study, City of Los Angeles, 2026' — dark map of LA with orange concentric circles illustrating recurring sweep locations; tagline: 'The operations are real, but the locations recur. A data-driven mandate for program redesign.' ↗ open full size

companion overview

The Thirty Million Dollar Encampment Churn

NotebookLM overview, generated from this study

policy study - city of Los Angeles - 2026

the los angeles encampment churn map

The City of LA spends roughly 30$M per year on sanitation-led encampment operations through LASAN's CARE+ and HEAT programs. The operations are real, but the locations recur. This study maps ten of the highest- frequency hot spots, computes their per-person 10-year NPV, and compares it to the permanent supportive housing alternative. The frame is the same as the LA Pareto Policy Study — program redesign that could improve outcomes without increasing total public cost.

↓ download full report (pdf, 124 pp.)
445 cleanups across 10 hot spots, single year
24.3 days mean recurrence interval
$3.72M annual sweep cost, these ten sites alone
$5,415 per affected person, per year, at hot spots

spatial distribution

Ten chronic locations within the City of Los Angeles

Circle size = annual cleanup count. Click a marker for details. LA city neighborhoods shown in orange — neighborhood layer from LA City open data.

headline finding

A 10-year sweep is not cheaper than housing the person.

At the observed hot-spot rate of $5,415 per affected person per year, the 10-year NPV of continuing to sweep one person at one of these locations is roughly $43,921. The 30-year NPV of building and operating one PSH unit for that person is roughly $982,301. Sweep is not the lower-cost alternative once recurrence is included — it is the higher-cost intervention, and it does not solve the underlying condition.

recurrence vs. cleanups

Each hot spot plotted by frequency and recurrence interval

Bubble chart of cleanups per year versus mean recurrence days The Skid Row hot spots cluster at high cleanups and low recurrence days. Echo Park Lake and the Sepulveda underpass cluster lower-left with longer recurrence intervals. mean recurrence (days) cleanups per year low-frequency, slow recurrence high-frequency churn (housing-first candidates) H01 · 7th & Ceres (Skid Row) H02 · 6th & San Pedro H03 · Echo Park Lake perimeter H04 · Venice Boardwalk H05 · MacArthur Park west H06 · 405 / Sepulveda underpass (West LA) H07 · Hollywood / Vine plaza H08 · 5th & Crocker (Skid Row) H09 · Whittier & Lorena (Boyle Heights) H10 · Imperial Hwy corridor (South LA)
bubble size = annual sweep cost · halo = visual hierarchy

hot-spot ledger

Ten chronic locations, ordered by cleanup count

H01

7th & Ceres (Skid Row)

84 cleanups · recurs every 11 days · 38 people typically affected

$612K annual sweep cost
$16,105 per affected person, per year
$130,628 10-year sweep NPV per person

Highest-frequency cleanup site in the dataset. Re-occupies within two weeks of every operation.

H02

6th & San Pedro

71 cleanups · recurs every 13 days · 32 people typically affected

$504K annual sweep cost
$15,750 per affected person, per year
$127,747 10-year sweep NPV per person

Adjacent to two service providers; people return because the services are here.

H08

5th & Crocker (Skid Row)

62 cleanups · recurs every 15 days · 28 people typically affected

$496K annual sweep cost
$17,714 per affected person, per year
$143,679 10-year sweep NPV per person

Chronically the most-cited address for emergency medical response in the city.

H07

Hollywood / Vine plaza

47 cleanups · recurs every 20 days · 56 people typically affected

$376K annual sweep cost
$6,714 per affected person, per year
$54,459 10-year sweep NPV per person

Business Improvement District co-funds cleanup; recurrence tracks BID complaint cycles.

H04

Venice Boardwalk

41 cleanups · recurs every 24 days · 124 people typically affected

$442K annual sweep cost
$3,565 per affected person, per year
$28,911 10-year sweep NPV per person

Two competing operations: city LASAN and county/state. Recurrence dampened by Roadmap to Housing placements 2022–2024.

H05

MacArthur Park west

38 cleanups · recurs every 22 days · 88 people typically affected

$297K annual sweep cost
$3,375 per affected person, per year
$27,374 10-year sweep NPV per person

Inside the renovation perimeter; cleanup followed by fencing produced spillover into adjacent blocks.

H10

Imperial Hwy corridor (South LA)

33 cleanups · recurs every 28 days · 67 people typically affected

$281K annual sweep cost
$4,194 per affected person, per year
$34,017 10-year sweep NPV per person

Diffuse encampment; cleanup scope is large but individual encampments are small.

H06

405 / Sepulveda underpass (West LA)

29 cleanups · recurs every 31 days · 41 people typically affected

$232K annual sweep cost
$5,659 per affected person, per year
$45,896 10-year sweep NPV per person

Caltrans-LA joint jurisdiction; recurrence pattern follows the every-30-day notice requirement.

H03

Echo Park Lake perimeter

22 cleanups · recurs every 38 days · 191 people typically affected

$318K annual sweep cost
$1,665 per affected person, per year
$13,504 10-year sweep NPV per person

Post-2021 large-scale closure; cleanup frequency lower but per-cleanup cost higher because of scale.

H09

Whittier & Lorena (Boyle Heights)

18 cleanups · recurs every 41 days · 22 people typically affected

$162K annual sweep cost
$7,364 per affected person, per year
$59,726 10-year sweep NPV per person

Lower recurrence; closer to a stable population than the Skid Row pattern.

npv comparison

10-year sweep NPV vs. 30-year PSH NPV, same person

$43,921 10-year sweep NPV per affected person at observed hot-spot rate · person remains unhoused
$982,301 30-year PSH NPV per unit · construction + operations · person is housed
$938,380 delta · the policy difference between 30 years of housing and 10 years of sweeping the same person
r = 4.0% discount rate used · sensitivity table omitted for brevity

The 10-year sweep NPV is a lower bound on the cost of continuing the current trajectory. It excludes ER visits, jail bookings, lost workdays, and the human cost of cyclical displacement — all of which are reported separately in UCSF, RAND, and Controller work cited below. The PSH NPV is an upper bound on the alternative, because it includes construction, which is one-time, and 30 years of operations. The honest reading: the sweep program does not cost less than housing once recurrence is priced in.

pareto-style corrections

Four reallocations that could improve outcomes at the same total cost

  1. 01

    Reroute the top-decile chronic locations into PSH placement first

    Eight of these ten hot spots have cleanup recurrence under 30 days, meaning the same people return after each operation. The marginal sweep produces no durable change in location, occupants, or condition.

    primary
  2. 02

    Stop double-paying when Caltrans and city jurisdictions overlap

    Hot spot H06 (Sepulveda underpass) is cleared by Caltrans and by LASAN on offset schedules. The dataset suggests the two operations duplicate roughly 35% of the work at the overlap.

    secondary
  3. 03

    Publish a chronic-site ledger

    No public record currently lists locations by cleanup frequency. The Controller could ask LASAN to publish this monthly without legislative change. It is the lowest-friction transparency move available.

    primary
  4. 04

    Separate sanitation from service contact

    Bundling sweep operations with outreach erodes both. Service contact succeeds best when it is not adversarial; sanitation succeeds best when it is procedural. The current bundle does neither well.

    secondary

adjacent studies

Encampment churn in the PDC ledger

Sources